CVE-2026-93247
CVE CVE-2026-93247EUVD EUVD-2026-86257Published 2026-09-24T15:51:04.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: mgmt: fix 'hdev->discovery.uuids' NULL dereference 'uuid_count' member of struct 'discovery_state' is assigned and read without any locks, so there is a chance of situation when uuid_count != 0, but uuids is NULL and there will be NULL pointer dereference. Possible race: 'hci_update_passive_scan_sync' 'hci_discovery_filter_clear' hdev->discovery.uuid_count = 0; <----------------------preempted-----------------------------> 'start_service_discovery' // Set uuid_count to value != 0 hdev->discovery.uuid_count = uuid_count; hdev->discovery.uuids = kmemdup(...); <----------------------preempted-----------------------------> spin_lock(&hdev->discovery.lock); kfree(hdev->discovery.uuids); hdev->discovery.uuids = NULL; spin_unlock(&hdev->discovery.lock); Now uuids == NULL and uuid_count != 0. So 'mgmt_device_found' -> 'is_filter_match' -> 'eir_has_uuids' receives non consistent discovery state, where NULL dereference of uuids happens. To fix it let's add discovery.lock around every read/write of uuid_count, uuids pair of struct members. It is also important to assign uuid_count value only after success kmemdup() allocation in start_service_discovery(), otherwise uuids is NULL, because kmemdup failed, but uuid_count is already assigned to non zero value. The following panic happens: [ ] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ ] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ ] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ ] CPU: 0 PID: 15056 Comm: kworker/u9:2 [ ] Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work [ ] pstate: 10400009 (nzcV daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ ] pc : eir_has_uuids+0x2d8/0x590 [ ] lr : is_filter_match+0x258/0x320 ... [ ] Call trace: [ ] eir_has_uuids+0x2d8/0x590 [ ] is_filter_match+0x258/0x320 [ ] mgmt_device_found+0x5b0/0xafc [ ] process_adv_report.part.0+0x8c8/0xf14 [ ] hci_le_adv_report_evt+0x338/0x3f0 [ ] hci_le_meta_evt+0x1f0/0x4c8 [ ] hci_event_packet+0x440/0xc9c [ ] hci_rx_work+0x44c/0xaf8 [ ] process_one_work+0x54c/0x103c [ ] worker_thread+0x6c4/0x10c4 [ ] kthread+0x274/0x2ec [ ] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ ] Code: 14000004 91004021 eb14003f 54000180 (f9400024) [ ] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux 6.17; 2935e556850e9c94d7a00adf14d3cd7fe406ac03 <c3f63610bceaa182e4683b23cc47baf36b5f1496; 6.6.117 <6.6.157; 86f3dcd1f331cfd4fd7ec88906955134ec51afbe <f02c01ccd12cb2b8a290077d4c90f29a6e109b16; patch: 6.18.52; 6.15.10 <6.16; 16852eccbdfaf41a666705e3f8be55cf2864c5ca <18fda026a13c5abd6c1e0dfd3549f490b73378fb; 6.16.1 <6.17; patch: 6.6.157; a351ff6b8ecca4229afaa0d98042bead8de64799; patch: 7.2.6; patch: 7.3-rc1; 7ce9bb0b95fc280e9212b8922590c492ca1d9c39 <bbd262d2d750b67b15a5e1008d3848309c87e7a7; f8069f34c4c976786ded97498012225af87435d7; patch: 0; 2935e556850e9c94d7a00adf14d3cd7fe406ac03 <59eecbe2f2f38d8f3e1104bd11da97f9a2c58998; patch: 6.12.110; 6.1.159 <6.1.188; patch: 6.1.188; 6.12.42 <6.12.110; 2935e556850e9c94d7a00adf14d3cd7fe406ac03 <ee2135a14fb2a3e176149122764d293f0796b1eb
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.