CVE-2026-89796
CVE CVE-2026-89796EUVD EUVD-2026-80396Published 2026-09-16T10:30:27.000ZLast changed 2026-09-21T13:15:02.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/core: avoid infinite kdamond_merge_regions() internal loop Patch series "mm/damon: unurgent fixes for infinite loop, NULL de-ref and races", v1.1. Sashiko found a few issues in DAMON that could cause infinite loop, NULL dereference and monitoring results degradation. The first two sounds scary but the infinite loop happens only under unreasonable user setup. The NULL dereference is only in a unit test. Monitoring results degradation is trivial since it is only best-effort, and those happens from only unlikely races. Still those are bugs that better to fix if possible. Fix those. This patch (of 6): Due to online parameter update like events, the number of DAMON regions could be higher than the user-set upper limit. kdamond_merge_regions() repeats merge regions until the number meets the limit, while doubling the merge threshold up to the theoretical maximum threshold. It is tried only up to the theoretical maximum threshold because even the aggressive merging can fail from reducing the number of regions under the user-defined upper limit. For example, there could be many user-defined non-contiguous regions that cannot be merged. The threshold based loop break condition is evaluated by comparing the threshold for the next merging try against the theoretical maximum threshold. If max_thres is larger than UINT_MAX / 2, doubling the threshold could make it overflow, and bypass the loop break condition. In the case, if the number of regions cannot be reduced under the upper limit like explained above, the loop will run infinitely. Prevent the case by doing the break condition check before doubling the threshold. Also, prevent the threshold exceeding the maximum threshold, as it could overflow and apply the wrong merge threshold. This issue is unlikely to occur in real world, since having the max_thres higher than UINT_MAX / 2 require unrealistically large aggregation intervals compared to the sampling interval. Also, it requires an unrealistically large number of uncontiguous regions setup. Nonetheless, the consequence is bad and the fix is simple. The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux 310d6c15e9104c99d5d9d0ff8e5383a79da7d5e6 <50a7a5aec1aa43efc297fd4377c1cbdc7d15620d; 11078e2d11465518a9e85096bd28f8cd5fa1ea41; 310d6c15e9104c99d5d9d0ff8e5383a79da7d5e6 <123e4619ab6c8ab1c4cb1d7a58311a2af13929cd; patch: 7.3-rc1; patch: 0; 6.9.10 <6.10; f2bd3184b6aeca6a497394b558337246e09fc02d; patch: 7.2.5; 310d6c15e9104c99d5d9d0ff8e5383a79da7d5e6 <769c16699c89811386eb003c8fd9dcb8d405b316; d7eda72e59bbf3ed592db7ff0fd8c246c73149a8; 6.1.101 <6.2; 1e865019cef354a5f0314491b4b4fc9f9a613642; 310d6c15e9104c99d5d9d0ff8e5383a79da7d5e6 <8a96a06e04d210845be5d9581c0e9e338947e8f8; 6.6.41 <6.7; 5.15.164 <5.16; patch: 6.18.53; 6.10; patch: 6.12.111
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.