CVE-2026-89725
CVE CVE-2026-89725EUVD EUVD-2026-76637Published 2026-09-11T19:46:36.000ZLast changed 2026-09-14T12:02:16.000ZCVSS 8.8
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: cec: stm32: prevent out-of-bounds write on RX overflow stm32_rx_done() appends each received CEC byte to rx_msg.msg[] using rx_msg.len as the write index, incrementing it on every RXBR (receive-byte-ready) interrupt without checking it against the buffer size: cec->rx_msg.msg[cec->rx_msg.len++] = val & 0xFF; rx_msg.msg[] is a fixed CEC_MAX_MSG_SIZE (16) byte array in struct cec_msg, and rx_msg.len is only reset on RXACKE/RXOVR or after a completed message (RXEND). The number of bytes received before RXEND is decided by the remote CEC device (it sets EOM), not by the driver. A peer that keeps sending bytes without ending the message drives RXBR repeatedly, pushing rx_msg.len past 16 and writing peer-controlled bytes out of bounds into the surrounding memory. This is reachable in normal operation once the driver has probed and receiving is enabled, from the IRQ thread, without any local privilege. The length check in the CEC core runs on the consumer side, after the byte has been stored, so it does not prevent the overflow. Bound the index in the driver before the store, as the other platform CEC drivers already do (e.g. tegra_cec), dropping the excess bytes of an overlong frame. Found by static analysis tool CodeQL.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 5.15.221; patch: 6.18.50; d69ae57453c80a2193bcdb3fd762efbec447eecf <fb9dda38d4b9e90db07ed9a0ee2d35bf85494035; d69ae57453c80a2193bcdb3fd762efbec447eecf <1b4fdefd788db990d1805feb5c7b2388de791ecd; d69ae57453c80a2193bcdb3fd762efbec447eecf <a85ce3b175615c2e13bc01e8a1b6b6b6910fde57; d69ae57453c80a2193bcdb3fd762efbec447eecf <f2499b720ea9b874d58770885c6c2e8445a8c3ef; d69ae57453c80a2193bcdb3fd762efbec447eecf <0c260d3f97e52978a8c769bb095ac0901333a3ac; d69ae57453c80a2193bcdb3fd762efbec447eecf <37ac45f7d6e3a6a5dcf6452a0b7bad9a543e8344; patch: 6.1.188; patch: 5.10.270; patch: 7.2.4; patch: 0; 4.13; d69ae57453c80a2193bcdb3fd762efbec447eecf <3df1a4026662121011187247897fe95fd84e8a3a; d69ae57453c80a2193bcdb3fd762efbec447eecf <c3edd7fb8e3692423a702705509947fc9c30b3d1; patch: 6.6.157; patch: 7.3-rc1; patch: 6.12.109
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.