CVE-2026-89547
CVE CVE-2026-89547EUVD EUVD-2026-76458Published 2026-09-11T19:44:22.000ZLast changed 2026-09-14T12:00:50.000ZCVSS 8.1
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: SUNRPC: Check svc pool percpu counter allocation __svc_create() initializes three per-pool percpu_counter stats and ignores every return value. On SMP, percpu_counter_init() fails when __alloc_percpu_gfp() cannot satisfy the allocation, leaving the failed counter with fbc->counters == NULL and its embedded raw_spinlock_t, list_head, and count never initialized. __svc_create() returns the half-constructed svc_serv to nfsd, lockd, or the NFS callback service anyway. Once that service is live, the hot-path increments in svc_xprt_enqueue(), svc_handle_xprt(), and svc_pool_wake_idle_thread() reach a counter whose backing pointer is NULL. The pointer is a per-cpu offset, so the access does not fault: it resolves to offset zero of the current CPU's per-cpu area and silently corrupts whatever variable lives there. A /proc/fs/nfsd/pool_stats read walks the same NULL per-cpu storage and returns garbage, and on CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK or lockdep it splats on the never-initialized lock. Creating the broken service requires a percpu allocation failure during RPC server startup, so it is reachable only by a local administrator under memory pressure or fault injection; a remote peer cannot induce the bad state on its own. Check each percpu_counter_init() return value in __svc_create() and fail when an allocation fails, unwinding the counters already set up in the current pool and in every pool initialized before it. A discrete percpu_counter_destroy() per counter at teardown frees each per-cpu allocation exactly once.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 6.12.109; ccf08bed6e7a80519569456edd2ea21b7b1701c6 <43e11e164704dde975c9edb370de1a06bec67270; 6.3; patch: 6.6.157; ccf08bed6e7a80519569456edd2ea21b7b1701c6 <b541a15046976e481618726cc23db0fb22d576db; ccf08bed6e7a80519569456edd2ea21b7b1701c6 <57ac7d899409b0a9b768cf417e3bb86bcca3d4c6; patch: 7.2.4; ccf08bed6e7a80519569456edd2ea21b7b1701c6 <3a2b7649de76376a69f1d3ed2a539fb15907cd4d; patch: 6.18.50; ccf08bed6e7a80519569456edd2ea21b7b1701c6 <bd1ef2cfb44d72b7aa6943e87b206eb0e30fbd0c; patch: 7.3-rc1; patch: 0
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.