CVE-2026-80932
CVE CVE-2026-80932EUVD EUVD-2026-76255Published 2026-09-11T19:42:07.000ZLast changed 2026-09-14T11:58:59.000ZCVSS 8.4
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock/virtio: flush works in dependency order virtio_vsock_remove() stops the virtqueues and then flushes each work item before freeing the enclosing virtio_vsock. The current order does not account for dependencies between those items: tx_work may queue send_pkt_work, and send_pkt_work may queue rx_work. In particular, send_pkt_work can set restart_rx and release tx_lock. The remove path can then stop the queues and flush rx_work before send_pkt_work queues it. Although the later send_pkt_work flush waits for that producer to finish, nothing waits for the newly queued rx_work, so kfree(vsock) can race with it. KASAN reported: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in virtio_transport_rx_work+0x487/0x4b0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888114c2b008 by task kworker/1:1/47 Workqueue: virtio_vsock virtio_transport_rx_work Call Trace: virtio_transport_rx_work+0x487/0x4b0 process_one_work+0x688/0x1120 worker_thread+0x45b/0xd10 Allocated by task 1: virtio_vsock_probe+0xef/0x6b0 Freed by task 84: kfree+0x131/0x3c0 virtio_vsock_remove+0xd1/0x100 Flush the works in producer-to-consumer order. virtio_vsock_vqs_del() has already disabled the queue callbacks and cleared the run flags, so after tx_work and send_pkt_work are drained, no source remains that can queue rx_work after its flush.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux 0ea9e1d3a9e3ef7d2a1462d3de6b95131dc7d872 <728836ebca239810f164262b10211ef59182f811; patch: 6.1.188; 0ea9e1d3a9e3ef7d2a1462d3de6b95131dc7d872 <2187a56f2fd1715d54daed6392809223c60544f3; 4.8; 0ea9e1d3a9e3ef7d2a1462d3de6b95131dc7d872 <f3313d952fc380cff53db9a28451a8807aa67b43; patch: 6.6.157; 0ea9e1d3a9e3ef7d2a1462d3de6b95131dc7d872 <b9cb4e8ba71c9fbd935d66baa71bbb0b87192c94; 0ea9e1d3a9e3ef7d2a1462d3de6b95131dc7d872 <531e2ac2dab1ab90a16427c4f9c86663633e9487; 0ea9e1d3a9e3ef7d2a1462d3de6b95131dc7d872 <da5e9f08714c19ba04e6863aca69d40f042f2e04; patch: 6.12.109; patch: 5.15.221; patch: 0; patch: 6.18.50; 0ea9e1d3a9e3ef7d2a1462d3de6b95131dc7d872 <e059a14c1067bcc4f7b1947cd09f2baab98e340f; patch: 7.2.4; patch: 7.3-rc1; 0ea9e1d3a9e3ef7d2a1462d3de6b95131dc7d872 <165a330a68b5f299d8735f0194c314cb2e571269; patch: 5.10.270
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.