CVE-2026-80849
CVE CVE-2026-80849EUVD EUVD-2026-71299Published 2026-09-04T15:54:59.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tcp-ao: fix use-after-free of current_key on reconnect to another peer tcp_inbound_ao_hash() is called before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken, with only rcu_read_lock() held. On the fast path for established sockets, if the rnext_keyid sent by the peer differs from current_key->sndid, the key the peer asked for is looked up and stored in current_key. The lookup is inside the RCU read side, but current_key outlives it. When the socket is disconnected and connect() is called again for another peer, tcp_ao_connect_init() unlinks every key that does not match the new peer and frees it with call_rcu(). If current_key points at such a key, it is cleared to NULL. The fast path reads sk_state only once on entry, so a softirq that got into it while the socket was still established can update current_key after that loop has already run. The update is inside the RCU read side, so it comes before the call_rcu() callback, and once the callback frees the key, current_key is left pointing at freed memory. The next transmission picks that pointer up in tcp_get_current_key(). tcp_ao_transmit_skb() then reads the traffic key from the freed object, which is the use-after-free. Wait for one grace period before unlinking, and only if a key is going to be removed. By the time tcp_connect() runs the socket is already in TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_AO_ESTABLISHED does not contain TCPF_SYN_SENT, so a softirq entering after the wait cannot reach the fast path, and the ones already in it have finished. The existing NULL handling in the loop is then enough.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux 0a3a809089eb1d4a0a2fd0c16b520d603988c859 <da4471557f279d0f56605158a625bb6e49ef7d41; 0a3a809089eb1d4a0a2fd0c16b520d603988c859 <73fde8fe4469f4ed8f0afcc0b9d6413002a9e6b3; patch: 7.1.13; 6.7; patch: 6.12.108; patch: 7.2.3; patch: 6.18.49; 0a3a809089eb1d4a0a2fd0c16b520d603988c859 <e54ad693eddb40c595add013f545354c538e325b; patch: 0; 0a3a809089eb1d4a0a2fd0c16b520d603988c859 <84a93b4e012587d0a4a84ffb23ec6da18e9d85f9; patch: 7.3-rc1; 0a3a809089eb1d4a0a2fd0c16b520d603988c859 <2857dcbd03cf3354af0fba1b65c6a260fb43811a
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.