CVE-2026-80762
CVE CVE-2026-80762EUVD EUVD-2026-71405Published 2026-09-04T15:12:34.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix accept list UAF during suspend hci_update_event_filter_sync() walks hdev->accept_list while sending a synchronous HCI command for each remote-wakeup device. The suspend path holds hdev->req_lock, but accept-list updates are serialized by hdev->lock. Consequently, remove_device() can free the current list entry during the controller wait. The following interleaving causes the use-after-free: hci_update_event_filter_sync() remove_device() fetch accept-list entry hci_set_event_filter_sync() wait for controller response hci_dev_lock() list_del() kfree() hci_dev_unlock() read the freed list.next KASAN reported: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hci_suspend_sync+0x835/0x910 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810bec8440 by task kworker/0:1/10 Workqueue: events vhci_suspend_work Call Trace: hci_suspend_sync+0x835/0x910 hci_suspend_dev+0x182/0x450 process_one_work+0x661/0x1090 worker_thread+0x45b/0xd10 Allocated by task 86: hci_bdaddr_list_add_with_flags+0x1a8/0x400 add_device+0x381/0x820 hci_sock_sendmsg+0x1033/0x1ea0 Freed by task 91: kfree+0x131/0x3c0 remove_device+0x429/0xb70 hci_sock_sendmsg+0x1033/0x1ea0 Snapshot the remote-wakeup addresses under hdev->lock. Release the lock before sending HCI commands. Clear the controller event filter before building the snapshot, and skip allocation and the second list traversal when there are no matching entries. This preserves the original filter and scan-state updates without retaining an accept-list node across a controller wait.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 7.1.11; patch: 6.18.47; patch: 6.12.108; 5.17; patch: 7.3-rc1; 182ee45da083db4e3e621541ccf255bfa9652214 <95bb57bc11a91caf042ad00fca85e480d3fda37f; 182ee45da083db4e3e621541ccf255bfa9652214 <b5181516a9f5c2fdb3271cdad72a5b16c6963a44; patch: 6.1.187; patch: 7.2.1; patch: 6.6.156; 182ee45da083db4e3e621541ccf255bfa9652214 <f57b399c4fa1501b2d5451f52d861ece86bcf3db; 182ee45da083db4e3e621541ccf255bfa9652214 <29c59212a507804d7616b8abf491d30b4ab8e75f; 182ee45da083db4e3e621541ccf255bfa9652214 <87ad116ac3abc6f2ce2b5b6c488f633003581eee; 182ee45da083db4e3e621541ccf255bfa9652214 <bb5f5414d1a6272a16f68684e998f4063dd19f57; patch: 0; 182ee45da083db4e3e621541ccf255bfa9652214 <fe93a697a7a92fa9adf78c9ff67a10db3193290c
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.