CVE-2026-74615
CVE CVE-2026-74615EUVD EUVD-2026-64552Published 2026-08-22T15:32:00.000ZLast changed 2026-08-25T05:40:42.000ZCVSS 8.8
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vxlan: do not arm the ageing timer on a device that is down vxlan_changelink() arms vxlan->age_timer whenever the requested ageing interval differs from the configured one: if (conf.age_interval != vxlan->cfg.age_interval) mod_timer(&vxlan->age_timer, jiffies); There is no netif_running() test, so the timer is armed even on a device that was never brought up. The only synchronous cancel in the driver is the timer_delete_sync() in vxlan_stop(), which is .ndo_stop. netif_close_many() drops devices without IFF_UP before __dev_close_many() runs, so that cancel is skipped for such a device. vxlan_setup() sets dev->needs_free_netdev = true and age_timer is a member of struct vxlan_dev, so free_netdev() releases the allocation the timer lives in while it is still queued on a timer_base. expire_timers() unlinks the entry before it loads timer->function, so the timer core writes through the freed object's list pointers: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __run_timers+0x208/0x654 Write of size 8 at addr ffff00001adace68 by task true/192 __asan_store8+0x84/0xac __run_timers+0x208/0x654 run_timer_softirq+0x154/0x18c Allocated by task 189: alloc_netdev_mqs+0x64/0x720 rtnl_create_link+0x4ac/0x520 rtnl_newlink+0x758/0xd00 Freed by task 191: netdev_release+0x40/0x58 netdev_run_todo+0x4a4/0x8c0 rtnl_dellink+0x200/0x4e8 The rtnl operations involved are netns-scoped, so an unprivileged user can perform them in a new user and network namespace. Arming the timer on a down device never had an effect: vxlan_cleanup() returns early on !netif_running(), and vxlan_open() arms the timer for any non-zero interval once the device is brought up. Add the missing test. Discovered by XBOW, triaged by Baul Lee <baul.lee@xbow.com>
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 5.10.265; 40051c4dcad5b374156ad9cceae8d15c0ef1cb95 <6b095e99b9e67ea31f0c4b00260e010898253519; 40051c4dcad5b374156ad9cceae8d15c0ef1cb95 <be44d79d14d7f9ae7c8ffb7272142005341b5123; patch: 7.2; patch: 6.18.45; patch: 0; patch: 6.12.104; patch: 5.15.216; 5.0; 40051c4dcad5b374156ad9cceae8d15c0ef1cb95 <9dc561f0522c35bdd66e0646a748814a138ec4ca; 40051c4dcad5b374156ad9cceae8d15c0ef1cb95 <b37971686ec59fb027fa4910ba16805e68fddb97; 40051c4dcad5b374156ad9cceae8d15c0ef1cb95 <26c179d47403d2f919ee914cc02c31d896b59fee; 40051c4dcad5b374156ad9cceae8d15c0ef1cb95 <46bb297ad77680e009244f067f27d51cf5b8c7cf; patch: 6.6.152; 40051c4dcad5b374156ad9cceae8d15c0ef1cb95 <619dd29045e439d0b0f8c6d4fec1af447a050680; patch: 6.1.183; patch: 7.1.9; 40051c4dcad5b374156ad9cceae8d15c0ef1cb95 <6b4119af544996a545cf84b16f1dbce829ba0de8
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.