CVE-2026-74482
CVE CVE-2026-74482EUVD EUVD-2026-59675Published 2026-08-15T12:27:15.000ZLast changed 2026-08-19T16:37:38.000ZCVSS 7.8
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: unlock i_mmap_rwsem before releasing after-split folios __folio_split() keeps dereferencing the mapping after the split: shmem_uncharge(mapping->host) and remap_page() while the folios are still frozen/locked, and i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping) at the very end, after the after-split folios have been unlocked and freed. Nothing holds an inode reference across that. The split relies on @folio -- which the beyond-EOF drop loop never removes, as it starts at folio_next(folio) -- staying locked and in the page cache to hold off eviction. But the unlock loop unlocks @folio before i_mmap_unlock_read() runs. If the caller's @lock_at is a tail beyond EOF, as memory_failure() passes when splitting a poisoned tail of a shmem THP that reaches past i_size during truncation, it too is gone from the page cache; so once @folio is unlocked no locked, in-cache folio pins the inode, and a concurrent final iput() can evict and RCU-free it before i_mmap_unlock_read() touches i_mmap_rwsem: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __up_read+0x634/0x790 i_mmap_unlock_read include/linux/fs.h:537 [inline] __folio_split+0x732/0x1640 mm/huge_memory.c:4100 try_to_split_thp_page+0xab/0x390 mm/memory-failure.c:1675 memory_failure+0x1394/0x26e0 mm/memory-failure.c:2470 Freed by task 4601: shmem_free_in_core_inode+0x54/0xb0 mm/shmem.c:5177 evict+0x57f/0xac0 fs/inode.c:870 Do every mapping dereference while @folio still pins the inode: drop i_mmap_rwsem right after remap_page(), before the loop that unlocks and frees the after-split folios, and clear @mapping so the exit path does not unlock it again. shmem_uncharge() and remap_page() already run before that point, so after this nothing past the unlock loop touches the inode or the mapping. This is now a rule the split depends on, alongside keeping @folio frozen until the page cache is updated: no inode or mapping dereference once the after-split folios start being unlocked.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 0; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 <6f5c272d71845a669e4c8ee5c72b376e29a0e6e5; patch: 6.6.151; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 <d640efe94d86d3be893d4c19220362546a637e90; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 <be106f7855f03d3128ed0ce70ba74b484a90b473; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 <10065fb891651d9541e7a5a2db84c1e656ece4f9; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 <e3dd774dbfd0b5bc2dbd0995221751b1234f8205; patch: 5.10.265; patch: 5.15.216; patch: 6.18.44; patch: 7.1.8; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 <f87c08060818ebb19bafed37c38244538da25097; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 <e923bd21058ea02fd0dcd3549d151d143fd036e5; patch: 6.12.103; patch: 7.2; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 <bc2f5eabaaf60ec18da70b619a8fba1bfb7dea3a; patch: 6.1.183; 4.8
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.