CVE-2026-74331
CVE CVE-2026-74331EUVD EUVD-2026-59478Published 2026-08-15T05:58:24.000ZLast changed 2026-08-17T05:17:22.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: firmware_loader: Fix recursive lock in device_cache_fw_images() A recursive locking deadlock can occur in the firmware loader's power management notification handler. During system suspend or hibernation preparation, fw_pm_notify() calls device_cache_fw_images(). This function acquires fw_lock to set the firmware cache state to FW_LOADER_START_CACHE and then iterates over all devices using dpm_for_each_dev() while still holding the lock. For each device, dev_cache_fw_image() schedules asynchronous work to cache the firmware. If memory allocation for the async work entry fails (e.g., in out-of-memory conditions), async_schedule_node_domain() falls back to executing the work function synchronously in the current thread. The synchronous execution path (__async_dev_cache_fw_image() -> cache_firmware() -> request_firmware() -> assign_fw()) attempts to acquire fw_lock again. Since the current thread already holds fw_lock, this results in a recursive locking deadlock. Fix this by releasing fw_lock immediately after updating the cache state and before calling dpm_for_each_dev(). The lock is only needed to protect the state update. Concurrent firmware requests will correctly see the FW_LOADER_START_CACHE state and use the piggyback mechanism, which is independently protected by its own fwc->name_lock.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 6.1.178; 3.7; patch: 7.2; patch: 7.1.5; ac39b3ea73aacde876d1d5ee1ca3e2719f771482 <d3ec78f8f8d48a04a9fac38d47275c34645e5103; patch: 5.10.261; patch: 5.15.212; ac39b3ea73aacde876d1d5ee1ca3e2719f771482 <806cb8fabfde7f830da5ae87777d52fdf50c4774; patch: 6.18.40; ac39b3ea73aacde876d1d5ee1ca3e2719f771482 <7865a1bfd20d10c03b083a5fc392d907ca5099b3; ac39b3ea73aacde876d1d5ee1ca3e2719f771482 <f25d6e4ec4c257030592bd671f113cf9584c52f0; ac39b3ea73aacde876d1d5ee1ca3e2719f771482 <c0f2dedd41fe14dbe076c1672214802fb42cd8c8; ac39b3ea73aacde876d1d5ee1ca3e2719f771482 <38149b57427c736c08d9aa4c7b87deacd53e9e63; ac39b3ea73aacde876d1d5ee1ca3e2719f771482 <490b0385e4cfac691f7b18dde821c13e77b4770b; patch: 6.6.145; patch: 0; patch: 6.12.97; ac39b3ea73aacde876d1d5ee1ca3e2719f771482 <a5b2a68a391b05d54552f13548a72a46c65006f7
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.