Patchlage

CVE-2026-72354

CVE CVE-2026-72354EUVD EUVD-2026-59253Published 2026-08-15T05:55:56.000ZLast changed 2026-08-17T05:43:12.000ZCVSS 8.8

What the advisory describes

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs: avoid stale runlist element dereference in MFT writeback ntfs_write_mft_block() maps each $MFT record through the $MFT data runlist. For sub-folio clusters it looks up a struct runlist_element under ni->runlist.lock, drops the lock, and later uses rl->length and rl->vcn when choosing folio_sz. That pointer is only borrowed from ni->runlist.rl. Concurrent $MFT allocation extension can merge a replacement runlist under the same lock, and ntfs_rl_realloc() can free the old backing array. If that happens between the lookup and the later folio_sz decision, writeback can dereference freed runlist storage. The buggy scenario involves two paths, with each column showing the order within that path: MFT writeback path: $MFT allocation extension: 1. Look up rl under 1. Extend the $MFT data allocation. ni->runlist.lock. 2. Publish a replacement runlist. 2. Drop ni->runlist.lock. 3. Free the old runlist array. 3. Read rl->length and rl->vcn to choose folio_sz. Compute the remaining run length while ni->runlist.lock is still held, and use that scalar after unlock. This preserves the existing folio sizing decision without carrying a borrowed runlist_element across the lock boundary. Validation reproduced this kernel report: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ntfs_mft_writepages+0x1c8d/0x1fb0 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0xa0 print_report+0xce/0x630 ? ntfs_mft_writepages+0x1c8d/0x1fb0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x20d/0x410 ? ntfs_mft_writepages+0x1c8d/0x1fb0 kasan_report+0xe0/0x110 ? ntfs_mft_writepages+0x1c8d/0x1fb0 ntfs_mft_writepages+0x1c8d/0x1fb0 ? __pfx_ntfs_mft_writepages+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? iput+0x92/0xa80 do_writepages+0x219/0x530 ? __pfx_do_writepages+0x10/0x10 __writeback_single_inode+0x117/0xf50 ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x130/0x270 ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___writeback_single_inode+0x10/0x10 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 writeback_sb_inodes+0x65b/0x1810 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? lock_acquire+0x2b8/0x2f0 ? __pfx_writeback_sb_inodes+0x10/0x10 ? lock_release+0x1e0/0x280 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x23/0x40 ? move_expired_inodes+0x2b8/0x850 __writeback_inodes_wb+0xf4/0x270 ? __pfx___writeback_inodes_wb+0x10/0x10 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? queue_io+0x2e4/0x410 wb_writeback+0x666/0x880 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __pfx_wb_writeback+0x10/0x10 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? get_nr_dirty_inodes+0x1c/0x170 wb_workfn+0x75e/0xbb0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x27/0x60 ? __pfx_wb_workfn+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_debug_object_deactivate+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0x2b8/0x2f0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? lock_release+0x1e0/0x280 process_one_work+0x8d0/0x1870 ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 worker_thread+0x575/0xf80 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2e7/0x3c0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x576/0x810 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __switch_to+0x57e/0xe10 ? __switch_to_asm+0x33/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> Allocated by task 970: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x353/0x920 ntfs_rl_realloc+0x3c/0x80 ntfs_runlists_merge+0x1212/0x3010 ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock+0x3e0/0x1f40 ntfs_mft_record_alloc+0x1ab4/0x4f10 __ntfs_create+0x680/0x2e50 ntfs_create+0x1e6/0x3a0 path_openat+0x2b55/0x3c10 do_file_open+0x1f4/0x460 do_sys_openat2+0xde/0x170 __x64_sys_openat+0x122/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x115/0x6a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Freed by task 1294: kasan_save_ ---truncated---

Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.

Products the advisory names

These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.

The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.

Carried in the product catalogue

An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.

Does this concern one of your customers?

This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.

Try it for 28 days

Patchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.