CVE-2026-72299
CVE CVE-2026-72299EUVD EUVD-2026-59198Published 2026-08-15T05:55:19.000ZLast changed 2026-08-17T05:42:32.000ZCVSS 9.8
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tipc: restrict socket queue dumps in enqueue tracepoints tipc_sk_enqueue() runs with sk->sk_lock.slock held while the socket is owned by user context. The spinlock protects the backlog queue in this path, but it does not serialize against the socket owner consuming or purging sk_receive_queue. KASAN reported: CPU: 14 UID: 0 PID: 1050 Comm: tipc3 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc6+ #126 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x76/0xa0 lib/dump_stack.c:123 print_report+0xce/0x5b0 mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0xc6/0x100 mm/kasan/report.c:597 __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x14/0x30 mm/kasan/report_generic.c:380 tipc_skb_dump+0x1327/0x16f0 net/tipc/trace.c:73 tipc_list_dump+0x208/0x2e0 net/tipc/trace.c:187 tipc_sk_dump+0xaf6/0xd60 net/tipc/socket.c:3996 trace_event_raw_event_tipc_sk_class+0x312/0x5a0 net/tipc/trace.h:188 tipc_sk_rcv+0xb1d/0x1d50 net/tipc/socket.c:2497 tipc_node_xmit+0x1c3/0x1440 net/tipc/node.c:1689 __tipc_sendmsg+0x97a/0x1440 net/tipc/socket.c:1512 tipc_sendmsg+0x52/0x80 net/tipc/socket.c:1400 sock_sendmsg+0x2f6/0x3e0 net/socket.c:825 splice_to_socket+0x7f9/0x1010 fs/splice.c:884 do_splice+0xe21/0x2330 fs/splice.c:936 __do_splice+0x153/0x260 fs/splice.c:1431 __x64_sys_splice+0x150/0x230 fs/splice.c:1616 x64_sys_call+0xeb5/0x2790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:41 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x620 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130 RIP: 0033:0x71624e8aafe2 Code: 08 0f 85 71 3a ff ff 49 89 fb 48 89 f0 48 89 d7 48 89 ce 4c 89 c2 4d 89 ca 4c 8b 44 24 08 4c 8b 4c 24 10 4c 89 5c 24 08 0f 05 <c3> 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 RSP: 002b:0000716157ffed68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000113 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000716157fff6c0 RCX: 000071624e8aafe2 RDX: 000000000000005f RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000066 RBP: 0000716157ffed90 R08: 0000000000008000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: ffffffffffffff00 R13: 0000000000000021 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fff89799c40 </TASK> The TIPC_DUMP_ALL tracepoints in tipc_sk_enqueue() also dump sk_receive_queue and can therefore dereference skbs that the socket owner has already dequeued or freed. Restrict these dumps to TIPC_DUMP_SK_BKLGQ, which matches the queue protected by the held spinlock. Keep the change limited to the enqueue path, where the unsafe queue dump is reachable while the socket is owned by user context.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 7.1.5; patch: 7.2; patch: 6.6.148; 01e661ebfbad40e6280fb8ec25f2861d39ba4387 <61a55fa24a5d737436018764a647fe5b6cb36371; 5.0; 01e661ebfbad40e6280fb8ec25f2861d39ba4387 <12876864f9de5fa6f611a30c6c17e405a773bf0a; 01e661ebfbad40e6280fb8ec25f2861d39ba4387 <b9e100815f4b55e9ccaf6af9a3aba173eb13d381; patch: 6.12.101; patch: 6.18.40; patch: 0; 01e661ebfbad40e6280fb8ec25f2861d39ba4387 <6acbbe54215d5f4251593000cff2bf51d6748713; 01e661ebfbad40e6280fb8ec25f2861d39ba4387 <acd7df8d955480a6f6e5bb809da67b1500cc3cf4
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.