CVE-2026-72118
CVE CVE-2026-72118EUVD EUVD-2026-59076Published 2026-08-15T05:52:57.000ZLast changed 2026-08-19T16:36:11.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics KCSAN detected a data race within the bcm_rx_handler() when two CAN frames have been simultaneously received and processed in a single rx op by two different CPUs. Use atomic operations with (signed) long data types to access the statistics in the hot path to fix the KCSAN complaint. Additionally simplify the update and check of statistics overflow by using the atomic operations in separate bcm_update_[rx|tx]_stats() functions. The rx variant runs under bcm_rx_update_lock to prevent races when resetting the two rx counters; the tx variant runs under bcm_tx_lock and only needs to guard its own counter's overflow. As the rx path resets its values already at LONG_MAX / 100, there is no conflict between the two locking domains (bcm_rx_update_lock vs. bcm_tx_lock) even for ops that use both paths. The rx statistics update and the frames_filtered update in bcm_rx_changed() were previously performed in two separate bcm_rx_update_lock sections. For an rx op subscribed on all interfaces (ifindex == 0), bcm_rx_handler() can run concurrently on different CPUs, so a counter reset by one CPU between these two sections could leave frames_filtered larger than frames_abs on another CPU, producing a bogus (even negative) reduction percentage in procfs. Update the statistics in the same critical section as bcm_rx_changed() to close this gap, which also removes the now unneeded extra lock/unlock pair around the traffic_flags calculation.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux ffd980f976e7fd666c2e61bf8ab35107efd11828 <8b2783172d92edd650de6006ebd1c800937021ab; ffd980f976e7fd666c2e61bf8ab35107efd11828 <e6c24ba95fc3f1b5e1dcd28b1c6e59ef61a9daa5; ffd980f976e7fd666c2e61bf8ab35107efd11828 <970caff5c1a63702c80e08d920256bcb5f88ecc5; 2.6.25; ffd980f976e7fd666c2e61bf8ab35107efd11828 <df47f07cdc801a6afe05a486b5a343c3e532a93c; ffd980f976e7fd666c2e61bf8ab35107efd11828 <fd75884eae40a7be47867cbfc9fc84a80bb8ddb4; patch: 6.6.148; patch: 6.18.42; patch: 6.12.101; patch: 7.2; patch: 0; patch: 5.15.216; patch: 6.1.183; patch: 5.10.265; ffd980f976e7fd666c2e61bf8ab35107efd11828 <8104bcdb2612fdda95169ddc3b49747b2ff98d24; patch: 7.1.5; ffd980f976e7fd666c2e61bf8ab35107efd11828 <47fca0d1620f2d4fab0677564989ef2b9c225c66; ffd980f976e7fd666c2e61bf8ab35107efd11828 <640acf3566fc897065127001be875ebc5401c218
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.