CVE-2026-72069
CVE CVE-2026-72069EUVD EUVD-2026-59027Published 2026-08-15T05:52:21.000ZLast changed 2026-08-17T05:40:00.000ZCVSS 9.8
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: locking/rt: Fix the incorrect RCU protection in rt_spin_unlock() rt_spin_unlock() releases the RCU protection before unlocking the lock. That opens the door for the following UAF scenario: T1 T2 spin_lock(&p->lock); rcu_read_lock(); invalidate(p); p = rcu_dereference(ptr); rcu_assign_pointer(ptr, NULL); if (!p) return; spin_unlock(&p->lock); spin_lock(&p->lock) lock(&lock->lock); rcu_read_lock(); kfree_rcu(p); rcu_read_unlock(); .... spin_unlock(&p->lock) rcu_read_unlock(); // Ends grace period rcu_do_batch() kfree(p); UAF -> rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(&lock->lock...) Regular spinlocks keep preemption disabled accross the unlock operation, which provides full RCU protection, but the RT substitution fails to resemble that. Same applies for the rwlock substitution. Move the rcu_read_unlock() invocation past the unlock operations to match the non-RT semantics. This makes it asymmetric vs. rt_xxx_lock(), but that's harmless as the caller needs to hold RCU read lock across the lock operation. The migrate_enable() call stays before the unlock operation because there is no per CPU operation in the unlock path which would require migration to be kept disabled.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux 0f383b6dc96e976dfbf2721b0bf10bd96103b341 <83f9fb561c1c3917e19f95523dd933c7d30291aa; patch: 6.6.148; 5.15; 0f383b6dc96e976dfbf2721b0bf10bd96103b341 <633cadbc0b8323f5cc140a285d2432089dbb534e; 0f383b6dc96e976dfbf2721b0bf10bd96103b341 <3cfaac77b3c32ac3940df28866de263c3f45d24c; patch: 6.12.101; patch: 7.1.5; 0f383b6dc96e976dfbf2721b0bf10bd96103b341 <1f0d56d3f1e88f20f6e46109402f8c15d59bac37; 0f383b6dc96e976dfbf2721b0bf10bd96103b341 <89038cc87d80c77e7aa6f42a64b2573b74af339f; patch: 7.2; patch: 6.18.40; patch: 0
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.