CVE-2026-68416
CVE CVE-2026-68416EUVD EUVD-2026-55602Published 2026-08-10T12:04:36.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mtd: fix double free and WARN_ON in add_mtd_device() error paths When device_register() or mtd_nvmem_add() fails inside add_mtd_device() for a partition, the error handling triggers mtd_release() via put_device() or device_unregister(). mtd_release() calls release_mtd_partition() which frees the mtd_info structure. However, callers such as mtd_add_partition() and add_mtd_partitions() also call free_partition() in their error paths, resulting in a double free. Additionally, release_mtd_partition() hits WARN_ON(!list_empty( &mtd->part.node)) because the partition node is still linked in the parent's partitions list when the release callback fires from the add_mtd_device() error path. Fix this by overriding dev->type and dev->release before put_device() in the error paths, so that device_release() invokes a no-op function instead of mtd_release(). For the mtd_nvmem_add() failure case, device_unregister() is replaced with device_del() to separate the device removal from the final kobject reference drop, allowing the override to take effect before put_device() is called. The callers' error paths (list_del + free_partition) remain the sole owners of mtd_info lifetime on add_mtd_device() failure, which is the expected contract. The normal partition teardown path is not affected: del_mtd_device() goes through kref_put() -> mtd_device_release() -> device_unregister() with dev->type still set to &mtd_devtype, so mtd_release() -> release_mtd_partition() continues to work correctly for the regular removal case.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 7.1.6; 19bfa9ebebb5ec0695def57eb1d80de7e9cab369 <e1e96aca1bdf391e2f49531c270ffc134e5b49a5; 19bfa9ebebb5ec0695def57eb1d80de7e9cab369 <ffe21a3545b439e7b11578a701c22a847c149561; 19bfa9ebebb5ec0695def57eb1d80de7e9cab369 <9d4af746af8ce27eefc2338b2feaa1e01f28b6c3; 19bfa9ebebb5ec0695def57eb1d80de7e9cab369 <820f983d641937a787e841ee4b93501f69f5683e; patch: 0; patch: 6.6.148; patch: 6.18.42; patch: 6.12.101; 6.6; patch: 7.2-rc4; 19bfa9ebebb5ec0695def57eb1d80de7e9cab369 <f98ae09c727dcf34f745c875661c64b642e4abfa
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.