CVE-2026-68315
CVE CVE-2026-68315EUVD EUVD-2026-55416Published 2026-08-10T12:02:50.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() When processing a RESET_IN_REQUEST from a peer, sctp_process_strreset_inreq() derives the stream count from the parameter length but does not check whether the resulting RESET_OUT_REQUEST would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN. The OUT request header (sctp_strreset_outreq, 16 bytes) is 8 bytes larger than the IN request header (sctp_strreset_inreq, 8 bytes). Generally, the IP payload is bounded to 65535 bytes, so the stream list cannot be large enough to trigger the overflow. However, on interfaces with MTU > 65535 (e.g., loopback with IPv6 jumbograms), a stream list that fits within the incoming IN parameter can cause a __u16 overflow in sctp_make_strreset_req() when computing the OUT request size, leading to an undersized skb allocation and a kernel BUG: net/core/skbuff.c:207 skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:2625 skb_put net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1535 sctp_addto_chunk net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:3695 sctp_make_strreset_req net/sctp/stream.c:655 sctp_process_strreset_inreq The local setsockopt path validates the generated reset request size. However, for an incoming-only reset, it accounts for the smaller IN request even though the peer must generate an OUT request with the same stream list. Such a request cannot be completed successfully by the peer. Reject peer IN requests whose corresponding OUT request would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN. Also tighten the local check so it does not send an IN request that would require an oversized OUT request from the peer.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 6.6.148; 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137 <b255d8cd6cc68045ae9eecbac3b3c14e1f176c9b; 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137 <00ae679cb21a035491fdad8d58dc6d79cc68b675; 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137 <6f0e39d180cd7cced647381b6fa14fd83d261047; patch: 6.12.101; 4.11; 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137 <1a10fe1aa9c01f41b389a31906a77d538637c9d9; patch: 7.2-rc5; patch: 0; patch: 7.1.6; patch: 6.18.42; 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137 <18ae07691d43183d270de8be9dc8e027906015d9
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.