CVE-2026-68118
CVE CVE-2026-68118EUVD EUVD-2026-55499Published 2026-08-10T11:58:38.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT. A non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a challenge ACK. RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped. Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order. Factor the per-netns challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets can share it. Use the request socket's send_ack() callback and its own out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux 3.0.58 <3.1; 282f23c6ee343126156dd41218b22ece96d747e3 <234f9ffbd9b2c1b24ec67200ea3cff07401bec48; 3.4.25 <3.5; 3.2.37 <3.3; 34fb350281ced2a72707a5c0064f69992d440edb; 282f23c6ee343126156dd41218b22ece96d747e3 <a28c4fcbf774e23b4779cae468e3497a5ad1f4a1; patch: 7.2-rc5; patch: 7.1.6; 61f69dc4e40e41b0018f00fa4aeb23d3239556fb; 3.6; 282f23c6ee343126156dd41218b22ece96d747e3 <22cec809b048495310f206d9abbcdbbfbdce3ae3; patch: 6.18.42; 86791bbfe5ed7b275be040cfeff049a1624af1b7; patch: 0
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.