CVE-2026-64527
CVE CVE-2026-64527EUVD EUVD-2026-49039Published 2026-07-25T09:20:51.000Z
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/hyperv: validate VMBus packet size in receive callback hyperv_receive_sub() reads msg->vid_hdr.type and dispatches into one of four message-type branches without knowing how many bytes the host wrote into hv->recv_buf. The completion path then runs memcpy(hv->init_buf, msg, VMBUS_MAX_PACKET_SIZE), so the consumer that wakes on wait_for_completion_timeout() can read up to 16 KiB of residue from a prior message as if it were the response payload. Pass bytes_recvd into hyperv_receive_sub() and reject any packet that does not cover the pipe + synthvid header. A single switch on msg->vid_hdr.type then computes the type-specific payload size: the three completion-driving types (SYNTHVID_VERSION_RESPONSE, SYNTHVID_RESOLUTION_RESPONSE, SYNTHVID_VRAM_LOCATION_ACK) fall through to a shared exit that requires that size before memcpy/complete, while SYNTHVID_FEATURE_CHANGE validates its own payload and returns before reading is_dirt_needed. Unknown types are dropped. SYNTHVID_RESOLUTION_RESPONSE is variable length: the host fills resolution_count entries, not the full SYNTHVID_MAX_RESOLUTION_COUNT array. Validate the fixed prefix first so resolution_count can be read, bound it against the array, then require only the count-sized array, so the shorter responses the host actually sends are accepted. Only run the sub-handler when vmbus_recvpacket() returned success. The memcpy length is bytes_recvd, which is bounded by VMBUS_MAX_PACKET_SIZE only on a successful receive; on -ENOBUFS vmbus_recvpacket() instead reports the required length, which can exceed hv->recv_buf, so copying bytes_recvd would read and write past the 16 KiB buffers. Gating on the success return keeps the copy bounded. The nonzero-return path is itself a malformed-message case and is now logged rather than silently skipped; channel recovery is not attempted. Rejected packets are reported via drm_err_ratelimited() rather than silently dropped, matching the CoCo-hardened pattern in hv_kvp_onchannelcallback().
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux 76c56a5affeba1e163b66b9d8cc192e6154466f0 <57d5d697642e05d5dd2d40660817765943dd709f; patch: 6.6.143; 76c56a5affeba1e163b66b9d8cc192e6154466f0 <049a6b474823049fe60212f25f26e4b30f44ee8f; patch: 7.1; 76c56a5affeba1e163b66b9d8cc192e6154466f0 <f5251226551bfec98c4705641b6f94ff1f238d91; 76c56a5affeba1e163b66b9d8cc192e6154466f0 <c8974d96b6a5496f33dc69a3ce28a7bf5078def4; patch: 6.1.176; patch: 6.12.93; patch: 6.18.35; patch: 0; patch: 7.0.12; patch: 5.15.210; 5.14; 76c56a5affeba1e163b66b9d8cc192e6154466f0 <7f87763f47a3c22fb50265a00619ef10f2394b18; 76c56a5affeba1e163b66b9d8cc192e6154466f0 <164dc7bf17609340233c6bf4f66bb7c7008a0511; 76c56a5affeba1e163b66b9d8cc192e6154466f0 <588c84b461393ff1998ac7b97b04f953f642e0df
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.