CVE-2026-64496
CVE CVE-2026-64496EUVD EUVD-2026-48840Published 2026-07-25T08:51:53.000ZLast changed 2026-08-05T12:42:28.000ZCVSS 7.1
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iio: event: Fix event FIFO reset race `iio_event_getfd()` creates the event file descriptor with `anon_inode_getfd()`, which allocates a new fd, creates the anonymous file and installs it in the process fd table before returning to the caller. The IIO code resets the event FIFO after `anon_inode_getfd()` has returned, but before `IIO_GET_EVENT_FD_IOCTL` has copied the fd number to userspace. But since fd tables are shared between threads, another thread can guess the newly allocated fd number and issue a `read()` on it as soon as the fd has been installed. This means the `kfifo_to_user()` in `iio_event_chrdev_read()` can run in parallel with the `kfifo_reset_out()` in `iio_event_getfd()`. The kfifo documentation says that `kfifo_reset_out()` is only safe when it is called from the reader thread and there is only one concurrent reader. Otherwise it is dangerous and must be handled in the same way as `kfifo_reset()`. If that happens, `kfifo_to_user()` can advance the FIFO `out` index based on state from before the reset, after the reset has already moved the `out` index to the current `in` index. That can leave the FIFO with an `out` index past the `in` index. A later `read()` can then see an underflowed FIFO length and copy more data than the event FIFO buffer contains. This can result in an out-of-bounds read and leak adjacent kernel memory to userspace. Move the FIFO reset before `anon_inode_getfd()`. At that point the event fd is marked busy, but the new fd has not been installed yet, so userspace cannot access it while the FIFO is reset.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774 <9dc84ba4be5bbeb29ee49efe6cea2cb32c461424; patch: 0; patch: 6.12.96; patch: 6.18.39; b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774 <af791d295737ea6b6ff2c8d8488462a49c14af01; b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774 <9edefd4c56bee3fe331e0355d1f10a533134999d; b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774 <f187dc5a4c4846ffa07d9bda6e760837ed005574; b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774 <a13ef1adbc62085b21b546b07b0be7e2fbf52150; b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774 <d16a702ca7d29c0b7a9b509339d1b044a1cadb32; patch: 5.10.261; 3.15; patch: 7.1.4; patch: 7.2-rc3; patch: 5.15.212; patch: 6.6.145; patch: 6.1.178; b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774 <72c6aa8e0d74eab91b8694cde97dec088c248fee; b91accafbb1031b80d22ad83576877ff2f8b4774 <0d4a646d7f87ea3625fafe387043fddc6a2f5e7f
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.