CVE-2026-64449
CVE CVE-2026-64449EUVD EUVD-2026-48793Published 2026-07-25T08:51:19.000ZLast changed 2026-08-05T12:42:12.000ZCVSS 7.8
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: staging: vme_user: bound slave read/write to the kern_buf size The SLAVE-path helpers buffer_to_user() and buffer_from_user() copy 'count' bytes into/out of the fixed-size kern_buf (size_buf == PCI_BUF_SIZE == 0x20000, 128 KiB) using *ppos as the offset, without bounding *ppos + count against size_buf. vme_user_write()/vme_user_read() only clamp count to the VME window size (image_size = vme_get_size(resource)), which VME_SET_SLAVE sets from the user-supplied slave.size -- validated against the VME address space (up to VME_A32_MAX = 4 GiB), not against PCI_BUF_SIZE. When the window exceeds 128 KiB, a write()/read() copies past the kern_buf allocation. Clamp count against size_buf in both helpers, with an early return when *ppos is already at/after the buffer end. *ppos is >= 0 here (the caller rejects negative offsets), so size_buf - *ppos cannot wrap. This mirrors the existing clamp in the MASTER-path helpers resource_to_user() / resource_from_user(), and matches the read()/write() convention of a short transfer at end-of-buffer. Found by static analysis (CodeQL taint tracking + CBMC bounded model checking) and confirmed dynamically under KASAN with the vme_fake bridge: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _copy_from_user+0x2d/0x80 Write of size 262144 at addr ffff888004100000 by task trigger/68 _copy_from_user+0x2d/0x80 vme_user_write+0x13e/0x240 [vme_user] vfs_write+0x1b8/0x7a0 ksys_write+0xb8/0x150
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux patch: 0; f00a86d98a1ec3e99d352cda926fab767ba43b1f <65358d89dc9f1c25d9364b2b3ef0f3b47717f9ed; f00a86d98a1ec3e99d352cda926fab767ba43b1f <8eff7cd4817e14dbe3b9952cce55ef52d1d38940; f00a86d98a1ec3e99d352cda926fab767ba43b1f <1b495fa0d4927c88d88bf346bf311f2e26e860ed; patch: 6.6.145; patch: 6.18.39; patch: 6.12.96; f00a86d98a1ec3e99d352cda926fab767ba43b1f <e99f2df433c63c86c93de1e5f08f16e404388756; 2.6.32; patch: 7.1.4; patch: 7.2-rc3; patch: 6.1.178; f00a86d98a1ec3e99d352cda926fab767ba43b1f <9f32f38265014fac7f5dc9490fb01a638ce6e121; f00a86d98a1ec3e99d352cda926fab767ba43b1f <adc8b9c30d716c362646edb45662aa1c641a154a
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.