CVE-2026-63803
CVE CVE-2026-63803EUVD EUVD-2026-45469Published 2026-07-19T12:02:08.000ZLast changed 2026-08-05T12:35:51.000ZCVSS 7.8
What the advisory describes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hdlc_ppp: sync per-proto timers before freeing hdlc state Each PPP control protocol (LCP/IPCP/IPV6CP) embedded in struct ppp registers a timer via timer_setup(). That struct ppp is the hdlc->state allocation, which detach_hdlc_protocol() frees with kfree() in both teardown paths: unregister_hdlc_device() and the re-attach inside attach_hdlc_protocol(). The ppp proto never registered a .detach callback, so detach_hdlc_protocol() performs no timer synchronization before the kfree(). The only cancel, timer_delete(&proto->timer) in ppp_cp_event(), is partial (it does not wait for a running callback) and only runs on the ->CLOSED transition; ppp_stop()/ppp_close() do not sync either. A ppp_timer callback already executing (blocked on ppp->lock) survives the kfree and then dereferences proto->state / ppp->lock in freed memory, leading to a use-after-free. Fix this by adding a .detach helper that calls timer_shutdown_sync() on every per-proto timer. detach_hdlc_protocol() invokes proto->detach(dev) before kfree(hdlc->state), so timer_shutdown_sync() now runs on both free paths. timer_shutdown_sync() is used instead of timer_delete_sync() because the keepalive path re-arms the timer through add_timer()/mod_timer() and shutdown blocks any re-activation during teardown. Initialize the per-protocol timers in ppp_ioctl() when the protocol is attached, and remove the now-redundant timer_setup() from ppp_start(), so that the timers are initialized exactly once at attach time and ppp_timer_release() never operates on uninitialized timer_list structures. attach_hdlc_protocol() uses kmalloc() (not kzalloc), so struct ppp's protos[i].timer is uninitialized garbage until the first timer_setup(); without this init-at-attach, attaching the PPP protocol without ever bringing the device up would leave timer_shutdown_sync() operating on uninitialized memory in .detach. Moving the init out of ppp_start() (which only runs on NETDEV_UP) into the attach path makes the initialization unconditional and avoids initializing the same timer_list twice. This bug was found by static analysis.
Source: EUVD (ENISA), in the words of the advisory.
Products the advisory names
These come from the advisory itself, not from any check we performed.
- Linux — Linux 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <86d80a231bde4cfb64bfbfbfffd83056fc93628f; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <a594debfd4e7ec39413647458907f689ef57fd2f; patch: 6.1.177; patch: 6.12.95; patch: 5.10.261; patch: 7.1.3; patch: 6.18.38; patch: 0; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <5a84398101bf9f11e84b176343e4e3ba83e668c0; 2.6.12; patch: 7.2-rc1; patch: 5.15.211; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <8308122bc9c065b1f376e081ed300129a2ac9545; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <c78a4e41ab5ead6193ad8a2dd92e8906bae659fa; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <ce8f9ddca0c9f217342a8b49efd309aa35b81a36; patch: 6.6.144; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <c64dbef1c0fbd36f9530aa75112acdf6a6d3cfd8; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <508a0139d3bf60f6a03d2fbfb63a89a9463d983a
The versions shown are the advisory's own. Patchlage compares no version numbers and derives no judgement from them — which version is installed is something a person has to look up.
Carried in the product catalogue
An estate covering these products can be recorded in Patchlage. An advisory about them appears in the next morning's situation report.
- Linux — Linux
Does this concern one of your customers?
This page cannot answer that — it does not know your estate. Whoever has recorded their environments gets the answer the morning after publication, together with a paragraph they can forward to the customer unedited.
Try it for 28 daysPatchlage reports hits and suspected hits. About everything else this system says nothing — neither this page nor the situation report ever claims that an estate is safe.