CVE-2026-97595
CVE CVE-2026-97595EUVD EUVD-2026-86903Veröffentlicht 2026-09-25T10:22:11.000ZZuletzt geändert 2026-09-25T14:41:28.000ZCVSS 7.5
Was das Advisory beschreibt
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mac802154: fix use-after-free of sdata via queued RX frames The RX softirq producer ieee802154_subif_frame() queues received beacon and MAC-command frames onto local->rx_beacon_list / rx_mac_cmd_list and schedules a process-context worker, storing a raw mac_pkt->sdata (and skb->dev == sdata->dev) with neither a reference nor any locking: - the lists have no lock: the softirq producer list_add_tail()s while the mac_wq worker list_del()s, so sibling interfaces on the same phy corrupt the list; - the workers dereference the interface after it may have been freed. mac802154_rx_mac_cmd_worker() touches mac_pkt->sdata directly, and mac802154_rx_beacon_worker() -> mac802154_process_beacon() dereferences skb->dev (== sdata->dev). Removing an interface frees its sdata (netdev_priv) while a queued frame still points at it, so a later worker run is a use-after-free. Reproduced under KASAN by flooding a victim interface with MAC command frames and removing it (the beacon path is the same class via skb->dev): BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mac802154_rx_mac_cmd_worker+0x463/0x630 [mac802154] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888002f9ea18 by task kworker/u8:1/31 Workqueue: phy0-mac-cmds mac802154_rx_mac_cmd_worker [mac802154] Call Trace: mac802154_rx_mac_cmd_worker+0x463/0x630 [mac802154] process_one_work+0x611/0xe80 worker_thread+0x52e/0xdc0 kthread+0x30c/0x630 ret_from_fork+0x2fd/0x3e0 Fix both lists together: - add local->rx_lock and take it around every list access: the softirq producer (plain spin_lock, softirq context) and the workers and flush (spin_lock_bh, process context); - pin the interface for the lifetime of a queued frame with netdev_hold()/netdev_put(), so the worker can safely dereference sdata / skb->dev even while the interface is being removed; - dequeue under the lock at the head and loop-drain the whole list in the workers (they previously processed one frame per run and relied on a later enqueue to drain the rest); - drop not-yet-started frames of an interface before it is unregistered, from ieee802154_if_remove() (after the RCU grace period) and from the ieee802154_remove_interfaces() loop -- the latter is the whole-phy teardown path, which does not go through ieee802154_if_remove(). An in-flight worker that already dequeued a frame keeps its own netdev reference; unregister_netdevice() then waits it out in netdev_run_todo(), which runs at rtnl_unlock() (rtnl released) and after the interface has been closed, so it does not pin rtnl. A worker blocked in an association TX only delays that one interface's unregister (the usual "waiting for %s to become free"), it does not hold rtnl. netdev_hold() is used for this reason instead of a cancel_work_sync() under rtnl, which would block on the worker's unbounded MLME TX wait via ieee802154_sync_queue(). The mac-command worker additionally skips processing for a stopped interface (ieee802154_sdata_running()), avoiding a needless association response during teardown.
Quelle: EUVD (ENISA), im Wortlaut der Meldung.
Produkte, die das Advisory nennt
Diese Angaben stammen aus der Meldung selbst, nicht aus einer Prüfung durch uns.
- Linux — Linux patch: 6.12.111; patch: 7.3-rc3; 57588c71177f0bfc08509c2c3a9bfe32850c0786 <3d1fde35f95d7f02a7dc473c51d81e8d9e992cfc; 6.3; 57588c71177f0bfc08509c2c3a9bfe32850c0786 <07f0214018d7241e3610c1be984c8abfce16c099; patch: 7.2.7; 57588c71177f0bfc08509c2c3a9bfe32850c0786 <4740ef0518c5e3bf31ebfb2288a6ac3b462ead06; patch: 6.18.53; patch: 0; 57588c71177f0bfc08509c2c3a9bfe32850c0786 <2f37fba846c9fdff5fc15b6d93656057ccd13031
Die genannten Versionen sind die Angabe der Meldung. Patchlage vergleicht keine Versionsnummern und leitet aus ihnen keine Aussage ab — welche Version installiert ist, muss ein Mensch nachsehen.
Im Produktkatalog geführt
Für diese Produkte kann ein Bestand in Patchlage erfasst werden. Ein Advisory dazu erscheint am Morgen danach im Lagebericht.
- Linux — Linux
Betrifft das einen Ihrer Kundenbestände?
Diese Seite kann die Frage nicht beantworten — sie kennt Ihren Bestand nicht. Wer seine Umgebungen erfasst hat, bekommt die Antwort am Morgen nach der Veröffentlichung, zusammen mit einem Absatz, den er unverändert an den Kunden weitergeben kann.
28 Tage testenPatchlage meldet Treffer und Verdachtsfälle. Zu allem anderen sagt dieses System nichts — weder diese Seite noch der Lagebericht behauptet je, dass ein Bestand sicher ist.